Call for Book Chapters

DM
Dr. Michael Jeffress
Mon, Aug 14, 2023 2:42 PM

Hello Colleagues,

Please share my new CFP in your networks. Text copied below and link to CFP
is at:
https://www.michaeljeffress.com/blog/prescribing-change-to-medical-school-education.
Thanks, Michael Jeffress

Call for Chapter Proposals
Working Title: Prescribing change for medical school pedagogy,
assessment, accessibility and inclusion

Editor/Publisher: Michael S. Jeffress, lead editor of The Palgrave
Handbook of Disability and Communication
(2023) and editor of three
volumes in Routledge’s Interdisciplinary Disability Studies Series. One or
more co-editors may join the project. Will be published by an international
academic press with options for open-access, and chapters will be subject
to peer-review process.
Background/Rationale: As a disability studies scholar who is also a
medical school counselor, I am troubled by the institutional barriers to
accessibility within medical school and residency programs.  Students with
disabilities are marginalized when it comes to medical school admissions
and programs of study.  Those with hidden disabilities who do find a seat
often fear bias and discrimination if they self-disclose. Those who do
submit requests for “reasonable accommodations” may be surprised to
discover an impersonal process and receive a terse rejection notice without
any explanation beyond, “Your request for accommodation has been
denied.”  Consequently,
many highly capable students with disabilities, who could unquestionably
perform the duties of any number of careers in medicine with only a few, if
any, adjustments to how, when, or where they do the work—none of which
would compromise any aspect of patient care or the quality of work
performed, instead are denied the opportunity to pursue their dream career,
and society will never benefit from the meaningful contributions to the
field of medicine these individuals would have made.
The institutional barriers to accessibility that need to be challenged
include a pedagogy that relies heavily on long days of lectures often tied
to stringent mandatory lecture attendance policies, the rigid adherence to
multiple-choice questions on standardized written exams as the primary form
of assessment, and a paradigm for medical school that requires all students
to pass all the same technical standards. These barriers are reinforced by
a discriminatory mindset that easily grows and festers among people who
find themselves part of an exclusive club and alumni and members of elite
academic institutions and professional associations in which tradition is
sacrosanct and economic incentives abound for maintaining the status quo.
The problem is exacerbated by the fact that medical schools in the U.S.
have an abysmal acceptance rate of less than 6%, and those in Canada and
Western Europe are not much better with rates less than 20%. This leads
thousands of students annually to look to offshore, for-profit medical
schools, and these schools have perhaps even less motivation to prioritize
accessibility because they operate outside the purview of ADA.
At a time when the ideals of  “diversity, equity, and inclusion” have
become pervasive in higher education, when pedagogical research and best
practices are calling for more engagement with active learning and
multimodal forms of assessment, and when Universal Design for Learning and
other efforts to create accessibility and inclusivity in the classroom are
being widely promoted and shown to benefit all students—not just those with
disabilities, it is time to call for a paradigm change in medical school
education and assessment.
Targeted Proposals: The volume will be multi-/interdisciplinary and
embrace varied theoretical and methodological approaches, so contributors
from any relevant academic discipline are welcome. Targeted approaches
include, but are not limited to:

  • Theoretical essays to address historical, philosophical, and/or
    ethical matters.
  • Autoethnographic essays that draw upon relevant personal experience as
    a medical student and/or healthcare professional.
  • Rhetorical approaches to critique relevant texts or other rhetorical
    constructs surrounding medical school pedagogy and assessment.
  • Original research involving pedagogy, assessment of adult STEM
    learners, medical students and/or healthcare professionals,
  • Original research assessing attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of
    current medical students or practitioners surrounding issues of
    accessibility, pedagogy and assessment or even those of the general public
    related to seeking care from disabled healthcare professionals.
  • Meta-analysis of relevant literature

Submissions are especially encouraged from scholars in medical sciences,
pre-med STEM fields, public health, disability studies, and education, as
well as from current medical students, residents, and faculty and those
employed as healthcare professionals or medical researchers. Highly desired
are submissions from any of the above who either navigated medical school
with a disability or became disabled while practicing in the medical field.

Submission guidelines: Please submit the following items by e-mail to Dr.
Jeffress by 10/15/2023 at msjeffress@gmail.com with the subject line
“Medical School Book CFP”:

  • Name, highest degree earned, and institutional affiliation(s) of
    author(s) (Info. will not be shared with reviewers).
  • Working title and 150-200 word abstract sufficient to allow reviewers
    to understand the main focus of the proposed chapter.
  • If you are proposing a chapter to discuss findings of original
    research, please indicate whether research is already completed. If so,
    please give basic details of the research (i.e., when, where, and how
    conducted, sample size, etc.,); if not, then provide plans for the same.
    Proof of IRB approval will be required.
  • Contributors who submit proposals deemed strong and a good fit will be
    invited to submit a full draft chapter. Invitations to submit drafts will
    be sent by November 1, 2023, and shall be due by March 1, 2024. Final
    decision to accept/reject for publication will be based on anonymous
    peer-review of full chapter drafts to be completed by June 1, 2024.  Final
    drafts will then be due by August 1, 2024.

Michael S. Jeffress, Ph.D.
Professor/School Counselor
Medical University of the Americas
https://www.mua.edu
Appt. booking: https://www.calendly.com/drjeffress
m.jeffress@mua.com

http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
Virus-free.www.avg.com
http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

Hello Colleagues, Please share my new CFP in your networks. Text copied below and link to CFP is at: https://www.michaeljeffress.com/blog/prescribing-change-to-medical-school-education. Thanks, Michael Jeffress *Call for Chapter Proposals* *Working Title:* *Prescribing change for medical school pedagogy, assessment, accessibility and inclusion* *Editor/Publisher:* Michael S. Jeffress, lead editor of *The Palgrave Handbook of Disability and Communication* (2023) and editor of three volumes in Routledge’s Interdisciplinary Disability Studies Series. One or more co-editors may join the project. Will be published by an international academic press with options for open-access, and chapters will be subject to peer-review process. *Background/Rationale:* As a disability studies scholar who is also a medical school counselor, I am troubled by the institutional barriers to accessibility within medical school and residency programs. Students with disabilities are marginalized when it comes to medical school admissions and programs of study. Those with hidden disabilities who do find a seat often fear bias and discrimination if they self-disclose. Those who do submit requests for “reasonable accommodations” may be surprised to discover an impersonal process and receive a terse rejection notice without any explanation beyond, “Your request for accommodation has been denied.” Consequently, many highly capable students with disabilities, who could unquestionably perform the duties of any number of careers in medicine with only a few, if any, adjustments to how, when, or where they do the work—none of which would compromise any aspect of patient care or the quality of work performed, instead are denied the opportunity to pursue their dream career, and society will never benefit from the meaningful contributions to the field of medicine these individuals would have made. The institutional barriers to accessibility that need to be challenged include a pedagogy that relies heavily on long days of lectures often tied to stringent mandatory lecture attendance policies, the rigid adherence to multiple-choice questions on standardized written exams as the primary form of assessment, and a paradigm for medical school that requires all students to pass all the same technical standards. These barriers are reinforced by a discriminatory mindset that easily grows and festers among people who find themselves part of an exclusive club and alumni and members of elite academic institutions and professional associations in which tradition is sacrosanct and economic incentives abound for maintaining the status quo. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that medical schools in the U.S. have an abysmal acceptance rate of less than 6%, and those in Canada and Western Europe are not much better with rates less than 20%. This leads thousands of students annually to look to offshore, for-profit medical schools, and these schools have perhaps even less motivation to prioritize accessibility because they operate outside the purview of ADA. At a time when the ideals of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” have become pervasive in higher education, when pedagogical research and best practices are calling for more engagement with active learning and multimodal forms of assessment, and when Universal Design for Learning and other efforts to create accessibility and inclusivity in the classroom are being widely promoted and shown to benefit all students—not just those with disabilities, it is time to call for a paradigm change in medical school education and assessment. *Targeted Proposals:* The volume will be multi-/interdisciplinary and embrace varied theoretical and methodological approaches, so contributors from any relevant academic discipline are welcome. Targeted approaches include, but are not limited to: - Theoretical essays to address historical, philosophical, and/or ethical matters. - Autoethnographic essays that draw upon relevant personal experience as a medical student and/or healthcare professional. - Rhetorical approaches to critique relevant texts or other rhetorical constructs surrounding medical school pedagogy and assessment. - Original research involving pedagogy, assessment of adult STEM learners, medical students and/or healthcare professionals, - Original research assessing attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of current medical students or practitioners surrounding issues of accessibility, pedagogy and assessment or even those of the general public related to seeking care from disabled healthcare professionals. - Meta-analysis of relevant literature Submissions are especially encouraged from scholars in medical sciences, pre-med STEM fields, public health, disability studies, and education, as well as from current medical students, residents, and faculty and those employed as healthcare professionals or medical researchers. Highly desired are submissions from any of the above who either navigated medical school with a disability or became disabled while practicing in the medical field. *Submission guidelines:* Please submit the following items by e-mail to Dr. Jeffress by 10/15/2023 at msjeffress@gmail.com with the subject line “Medical School Book CFP”: - Name, highest degree earned, and institutional affiliation(s) of author(s) (Info. will not be shared with reviewers). - Working title and 150-200 word abstract sufficient to allow reviewers to understand the main focus of the proposed chapter. - If you are proposing a chapter to discuss findings of original research, please indicate whether research is already completed. If so, please give basic details of the research (i.e., when, where, and how conducted, sample size, etc.,); if not, then provide plans for the same. Proof of IRB approval will be required. - Contributors who submit proposals deemed strong and a good fit will be invited to submit a full draft chapter. Invitations to submit drafts will be sent by November 1, 2023, and shall be due by March 1, 2024. Final decision to accept/reject for publication will be based on anonymous peer-review of full chapter drafts to be completed by June 1, 2024. Final drafts will then be due by August 1, 2024. *Michael S. Jeffress, Ph.D.* Professor/School Counselor Medical University of the Americas https://www.mua.edu Appt. booking: https://www.calendly.com/drjeffress m.jeffress@mua.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free.www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>